Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 23:54:53 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: SPEWS blocked me Message-ID: <20021119045453.GB28126@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <3DD9AD23 DOT 70705 AT netstd DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DD9AD23.70705@netstd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 11:16:51AM +0800, Wu Yongwei wrote: >Is SPEWS necessary? I see that the whole DSL IP range of our company's >ISP is blocked. Terrible that each user needs to beg the mercy of SPEWS >or individually send request to register their e-mail addresses safely >to use in Cygwin. Yeah. It's really really terrible isn't it? The horror of having to take an extra five minutes to register yourself. The mind numbing searing pain is almost inconceivable. >No intention to insult. Just feel there may be alternate ways to do >that. Once our mail server is blocked by a open relay list, but it is >easier to remedy and I feel good that a security hole in our mail server >is eliminated. Given that a marjority of the spam that makes it by all of the other filters is blocked by OsiruSoft, I don't think I'm going to be eliminating it anytime soon, especially when you can trivially bypass the block. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/