Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <003d01c28f56$4e245ac0$78d96f83@pomello> From: "Max Bowsher" To: , "Francis Litterio" References: Subject: Re: What is the W2K equivalent of "chgrp groupname file"? Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 23:00:35 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Francis Litterio wrote: > I just upgraded to a Cygwin 1.3.15-2, and I'm using ntsec-style > security with NTFS for the first time. This has me wondering about > group ownership of files, specifically: > > What is the W2K equivalent of the command "chgrp groupname file"? > > Using Explorer, I can change the user that owns a file or directory, > but I see no way to change the group owner. Is "group ownership" > really a feature of NTFS or is it faked by Cygwin? I believe, but have not checked, that it is a feature of NTFS - just that Windows doesn't actually use it for anything much, just defaulting it to 'None' or 'SYSTEM'. Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/