Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3DD80769.82E96993@gmx.net> Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 22:17:29 +0100 From: Yves Forkl X-Accept-Language: de,fr,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: libxml2/libxslt binaries: libxml2 version mismatch in xsltproc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In various versions of the libxml2/libxslt binaries, the executable "xsltproc" distributed with the latest libxslt package was compiled against an older version of libxml2 than the latest release currently distributed. From the most recent Cygwin releases of libxml2/libxslt: $ xsltproc -V Using libxml 20423, libxslt 10013 and libexslt 705 ^^^^^ xsltproc was compiled against libxml 20417, libxslt 10013 and libexslt 705 ^^^^^ libxslt 10013 was compiled against libxml 20417 libexslt 705 was compiled against libxml 20417 Slightly older: $ xsltproc -V Using libxml 20417, libxslt 10010 and libexslt 703 ^^^^^ xsltproc was compiled against libxml 20413, libxslt 10010 and libexslt 703 ^^^^^ libxslt 10010 was compiled against libxml 20413 libexslt 703 was compiled against libxml 20413 To get xsltproc working properly, it may be necessary either to rebuild it (which I didn't manage to) or to downgrade to the older libxml2 binary. So it would perhaps be better if that correspondence of the libxml2 version could be ensured before the libxml2 and libxslt binaries are distributed together in their latest releases. Y. Forkl -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/