Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 01:59:05 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Hey hey, I now have the emacs 100% cpu usage bug too [CGF, this one is for you] Message-ID: <20021116065905.GB12422@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20021115220304 DOT GE27413 AT redhat DOT com> <20021115230010 DOT 50079 DOT qmail AT web20809 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <20021116041055 DOT GA31944 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021116041055.GA31944@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i [Just closing out all of these discussions] On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 11:10:55PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 03:00:10PM -0800, Bill Priest wrote: >>>>>Could that explain why Bill still sees the problem with his 2002-11-14 >>>>>snapshot? >>>> >>>>I downloaded the latest version on 11/15 and still reproduced the >>>>problem. >>> >>>cygcheck output? >> >>See attached. > >If this is the TERM=linux problem then this is, AFAIK, a different >problem than the one I just fixed. I've already posted that it seems >to be in cygwin's tty handling code. This is the long standing deadlock in cygwin's pty code. I've added a temporary workaround for this to the source code but, as I mentioned in two other threads, cygwin isn't the real problem here. For once. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/