Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:03:04 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Hey hey, I now have the emacs 100% cpu usage bug too [CGF, this one is for you]
Message-ID: <20021115220304.GE27413@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <9910-Fri15Nov2002203400+0000-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk> <20021115220048 DOT 63683 DOT qmail AT web20808 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20021115220048.63683.qmail@web20808.mail.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 02:00:48PM -0800, Bill Priest wrote:
>
>--- David Starks-Browning <starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk> wrote:
>> On Friday 15 Nov 02, Christopher Faylor writes:
>> > Note that there were multiple snapshots generated
>> yesterday so if you
>> > grabbed one and it didn't work, it's worthwhile to
>> grab the latest.
>> 
>> Multiple versions dated 2002-11-14?
>> 
>> Could that explain why Bill still sees the problem
>> with his 2002-11-14
>> snapshot?
>
>I downloaded the latest version on 11/15 and still
>reproduced the problem.

cygcheck output?

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/