Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:03:04 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Hey hey, I now have the emacs 100% cpu usage bug too [CGF, this one is for you] Message-ID: <20021115220304.GE27413@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <9910-Fri15Nov2002203400+0000-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk> <20021115220048 DOT 63683 DOT qmail AT web20808 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021115220048.63683.qmail@web20808.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 02:00:48PM -0800, Bill Priest wrote: > >--- David Starks-Browning wrote: >> On Friday 15 Nov 02, Christopher Faylor writes: >> > Note that there were multiple snapshots generated >> yesterday so if you >> > grabbed one and it didn't work, it's worthwhile to >> grab the latest. >> >> Multiple versions dated 2002-11-14? >> >> Could that explain why Bill still sees the problem >> with his 2002-11-14 >> snapshot? > >I downloaded the latest version on 11/15 and still >reproduced the problem. cygcheck output? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/