Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Norton Allen Message-Id: <200211152020.PAA09886@bottesini.harvard.edu> Subject: Re: Setup installed to c:/cygwin/usr/bin To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:20:36 -0500 (est) In-Reply-To: from "Igor Pechtchanski" at Nov 15, 2 03:00:51 pm MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Norton Allen wrote: > > I just noticed that the original installer does not have > > any entry for Cygwin under HKEY_USERS whereas the other > > user does. Curious. > > -Norton > > Ah, there's your problem! This was the guess I expressed two messages > ago: Right, but the output of mount claims this has no effect on the actual mounts. And certainly as the other user (that has an HKEY_USERS entry) I certainly see /bin and /usr/bin as the same directory, and I don't see what is in c:\cygwin\usr\bin at all. [These points are not a contradicition to what you're saying, just reiterating the facts.] > > Just a WAG, but does that other user have user mounts that maybe > > override the system ones? > > If the output of mount is identical, then there may be a bug in mount > processing, as user mounts should take precedence over system ones. In > any case, it looks like setup and cygwin view user and system mounts with > different precedences. Anyone care to comment on that? I would agree with that. It appears to me that setup fails to see the system mounts that cygwin sees. -Norton -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/