Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Norton Allen Message-Id: <200211151939.OAA07302@bottesini.harvard.edu> Subject: Re: Setup installed to c:/cygwin/usr/bin To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:39:07 -0500 (est) In-Reply-To: from "Igor Pechtchanski" at Nov 15, 2 02:15:11 pm MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > Hmm, don't know if there is a way in NT to restrict access to HKLM > registry entries, but it certainly sounds like the second user doesn't see > these entries... This might not matter, but is either of them a domain > user, by any chance? > > > > I'm assuming, of course, that you ran 'mount' as the original installing > > > user. > > > > I never explicitly ran mount. Presumably it was run by setup > > during the original install. > > -Norton > > I meant the 'mount' the output of which you posted to the list. It would > be interesting to see the output of 'mount' run by the second user as > well. The mount output I posted was for the second user (not the original installer), but the mount output for the original installer looks identical. Neither is a domain user. I just noticed that the original installer does not have any entry for Cygwin under HKEY_USERS whereas the other user does. Curious. -Norton -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/