Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <000901c28b04$e0bce100$6fc82486@medschool.dundee.ac.uk> Reply-To: From: To: Cc: Subject: Re: pico and nano: number of lines displayed Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 11:07:38 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Actually there is something going on here. I reverted to an earlier version of Cygwin and even in a non-fullscreen rxvt environment, any of nano, pico and vim use the entire available depth of the window to display the text file being edited (so that for instance in pico and nano the Help menu appears at the bottom of the page and 50+ lines of the file are visible). The latest current version of Cygwin now displays only 20 lines of the file being edited to screen, exactly as in a basic bash window. Sorry not to be more specific about when the change occurred, but I think it is absolutely recent. I use this size of window for these editors the whole time, and the altered presentation caught my eye immediately. Unfortunately all of cygwin, login and Goodness knows what have been updated recently and I am not competent to isolate cause, only consequence! (Surely somebody out there uses viim in a rxvt windows and has also noticed this difference, yesterday or the day before??) Fergus -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/