Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 10:38:57 -0800 (PST) From: "Peter A. Castro" To: Randall R Schulz cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: RE: NO huge packages, please! In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20021107101725.0299c540@pop3.cris.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Randall R Schulz wrote: > Peter, > > At 10:10 2002-11-07, Peter A. Castro wrote: > >On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Randall R Schulz wrote: > > > > > At 09:43 2002-11-07, Peter A. Castro wrote: > > > >... > > > > > > > >... Perhaps it would be better to enhance the Setup tool to be a little > > > >more robust in it's download processing. Perhaps adding a re-try option > > > >on an incomplete package pull? I haven't looked into the guts of Setup > > > >for a while, but I'd bet that this might be doable with a minimum hassle. > > > > > > Peter, > > > Setup does this already. > > > >Hmmm, then perhaps this is a more recent addition? I seem to recall > >having problems in this area a while ago (which is one of the reasons I > >have a local mirror). That or perhaps it was some other problem and just > >showed similar symptoms. Since I've been using a local mirror, I haven't > >experienced anything like what we've been talking about. But, if this is > >the case, and Setup has had this functionality for a while, then why was > >the subject of having trouble downloading over an unreliable connection > >coming up? I'm a bit confused as to which problem we are addressing here > >now. > > > >-- > >Peter A. Castro or > > "Cats are just autistic Dogs" -- Dr. Tony Attwood > > > Well, I suppose the conversation drifted a bit. Mark Harig suggesting > alternate software for mirroring in order to mitigate the effects of an > unreliable Internet connection. > > While it's true that Setup does have a retry facility if something goes > wrong during download, it's manual: if a failure occurs during package > download, then when everything is done you get an alert stating that there > was a problem and asking if you want to retry. Then you're taken back to > the page of the wizard that downloads the package list and you pretty much > have to start over. > > Far from ideal, really. Ah, yes, I do recall seeing this. But, I wouldn't really call this a re-try facility, because if 1 out of 100 packages downloaded with errors, the "re-try" will pull all 100 packages all over again. A far cry from ideal, I'd say :) This is why I was proposing something much more realtime. Such that during the download of a package, if an error occurs, it prompts you to re-try right there any then. A further optimization would be to have a checkbox to automagicaly do a re-try up to a certain number of times. > On the other hand, wget is pretty automatic and is rather persistent (and > customizably so) in its attempts to surmount failures during downloads, so > there's much to recommend it for users with links that exhibit frequent > failures. Except that they end up either having to craft the commands to pull only those package directories they really want, or pull the whole she-bang. Again, not idea. If I get time, I'll look at Setup and see what it might take to add this "feature" (no guarantees, though). > By the way, thanks for giving the details on altering wget's naming > behavior. I figured it could handle it--it's got so many options--but I was > a little too lazy to go look it up. You're welcome :) > Randall Schulz > Mountain View, CA USA -- Peter A. Castro or "Cats are just autistic Dogs" -- Dr. Tony Attwood -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/