Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 22:03:56 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Problem with function keys codes with vt100 emulation
Message-ID: <20021107030356.GA31475@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20021106163952 DOT 02068e70 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20021106131511 DOT 0212e850 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20021106151936 DOT 01febb78 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20021106163952 DOT 02068e70 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20021106181835 DOT 02a5b3c0 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <20021107024215 DOT GA16492 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20021107024215.GA16492@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 09:42:15PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 06:23:37PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
>>Chris,
>>
>>At 18:07 2002-11-06, you wrote:
>>>On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 04:50:12PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
>>>>The terminal emulation available under Cygwin is not programmable, so it's
>>>>up to the software to adapt to it, not vice versa.
>>>
>>>I will note that it is very weird that F1 - F4 in cygwin are generating
>>>the same sequences as up/down/left/right.  Something is messed up
>>>somewhere, there.
>>
>>It would be weird if it were happening, but I have readline ("~/.inputrc") 
>>mappings for all the Fn keys and "Insert" and "Delete" as well as the usual 
>>pre-defined, built-in mappings for the arrow keys. Though I usually keep 
>>NumLock engaged, the arrow keys on the number pad work fine when I 
>>disengage it.
>
>But, if you type F1 while you are in /bin/sh, you'll see the cursor move
>up a line.  That indicates that cygwin is mapping F1 to ^[[A, which is,
>AFAICT, incorrect.  It probably *should* be mapping to ^[OP.  And, F2
>should be ^[OQ, etc.

Nevermind.  I see.  That's the way linux does it.  Seems odd to me.  Why
map f1 to be the same as up arrow?

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/