Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 17:18:11 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Process does not respond to signals on read() of win32 handle. (fwd) Message-ID: <20021106221811.GA3240@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 04:22:18PM -0500, sanjayl AT mindspring DOT com wrote: >Hi Mark, > >I am running Cygwin on Windows 2000. Here is the output of uname -a > > > >CYGWIN_NT-5.0 REDBSUNJAY1 1.3.14(0.62/3/2) 2002-10-24 10:48 i686 unknown > >And here is a short program that can reproduce the bug. I just >CreateFile() COM0 and then map it to a cygwin file desciptor. I then >read() on the fd. At this point the program stops responding to any >signals (CTRL-C) etc, until some data shows up on the device to wake up >the read. I just use g++ com.cpp to compile the executable. Theoretically, if you pass "/dev/com0" to the "cygwin_attach_handle_to_fd" it would work correctly. If you don't pass the name of a known device to cygwin_attach_handle_to_fd it assumes it is a fast device for which no special signal handling is necessary. So, if it blocks, it will not respond to signals, as you've discovered. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/