Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 19:32:52 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin Subject: Re: ssh-host-config suggestion (was: Re: Updated: OpenSSH-3.5p1-1) Message-ID: <20021106193252.C18539@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin References: <20021106153438 DOT K2180 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <15817 DOT 18485 DOT 56727 DOT 29262 AT jupiter DOT akutech-local DOT de> <20021106181026 DOT C2180 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20021106175200 DOT GA16885 AT butch DOT jgcomp DOT com> <20021106190159 DOT A18539 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20021106182047 DOT GA17248 AT butch DOT jgcomp DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021106182047.GA17248@butch.jgcomp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 01:20:47PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote: > Why is it preferable to run chown and think it did something, as indicated by > the success exit status, rather than be told it was not an appropriate call. It would require to patch a bunch of applications just because the underlying FS doesn't support chown. That's not exactly the purpose of Cygwin which tries to simplify porting apps, not making it harder. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/