Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 19:01:59 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: ssh-host-config suggestion (was: Re: Updated: OpenSSH-3.5p1-1)
Message-ID: <20021106190159.A18539@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <20021106153438 DOT K2180 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <15817 DOT 18485 DOT 56727 DOT 29262 AT jupiter DOT akutech-local DOT de> <20021106181026 DOT C2180 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20021106175200 DOT GA16885 AT butch DOT jgcomp DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20021106175200.GA16885@butch.jgcomp.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i

On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 12:52:00PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 06:10:26PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >   The chown(2) syscall
> > returns intentionally always 0 if any of these conditions isn't met.
> 
> That behavior seems rather "non-unix-like".  If chown(2) fails to work
> shouldn't return an error status, and possibly set ERRNO.  Then chown(1)
> could report a reasonable error message and exit status.

On FAT?  Chown obviously can't succeed on FAT.  So all 9x users will be
out of luck?

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/