Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Lotus-FromDomain: COMPUTRITION From: Fred_Smith AT computrition DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <85256C68.0077717A.00@cinote.computrition.com> Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 16:46:01 -0500 Subject: Backwards typeahead Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 11:55:52AM -0500, Steve Chapel wrote: >>Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 10:25:58AM -0500, Steve Chapel wrote: >>> >>>>So again I ask for information on how this cygwin problem can be solved. >>>>It makes typeahead completely useless for me. >>> >>>What kind of information are you hoping for? If we knew how to solve the >>>problem it would be solved. >> >>I saw on another post that what was needed to fix the problem is someone >>who can reproduce it and is willing to use gdb to track down the >>problem. I just volunteered. Was the earlier post incorrect? > >Without knowing what "the earlier post" might be, that's rather hard to say. There IS a bug in certain versions of Windows wherein fast type-ahead that occurs while the system is busy will be queued up in the incorrect order. What I do not know is if it has ever been fixed, and if so in what version. I know it exists in 95 (and probably its derivatives). It's documented in the Kermit-95 pages at columbia.edu as a windows bug. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/