Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <007e01c28445$b0c510f0$78d96f83@pomello> From: "Max Bowsher" To: , "Jens Yllman" References: <5 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 6 DOT 0 DOT 20021104214628 DOT 01f89700 AT pop3 DOT yllman DOT com> Subject: Re: 1.3.13: problem using ntohs() in asm/bytorder.h in gcc 3.2. Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 21:03:57 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Jens Yllman wrote: > But isn't that just this implementation. Should I realy take for > granted that they always are defines? When compiling without -O2 they > seem to be functions. So? Dropping your unnecessary :: is not "taking for granted that they always are defines". Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/