Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <007e01c28445$b0c510f0$78d96f83@pomello>
From: "Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, "Jens Yllman" <jens AT yllman DOT com>
References: <5 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 6 DOT 0 DOT 20021104214628 DOT 01f89700 AT pop3 DOT yllman DOT com>
Subject: Re: 1.3.13: problem using ntohs() in asm/bytorder.h in gcc 3.2.
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 21:03:57 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

Jens Yllman <jens AT yllman DOT com> wrote:

> But isn't that just this implementation. Should I realy take for
> granted that they always are defines? When compiling without -O2 they
> seem to be functions.

So? Dropping your unnecessary :: is not "taking for granted that they always
are defines".

Max.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/