Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 12:25:46 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cfr AT pobox DOT com
Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: fsx versus cygwin?
Message-ID: <20021101172546.GA9769@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cfr AT pobox DOT com, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20021101170857 DOT 69840 DOT qmail AT web20909 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20021101170857.69840.qmail@web20909.mail.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

Please check out the project web page for links to available information
and ports:  http://cygwin.com/ .

If you don't see what you need there, then the cygwin mailing list is
the best place to make observations or get questions answered.
Information on the mailing list is available at the project web page.

For your convenience, I've reset the Reply-To: address to point to the
cygwin mailing list.  I've also Cc'ed this reply there.

On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 09:08:57AM -0800, Charles Randall wrote:
>Chris,
>
>Sorry to send this to you directly, but it is a very
>specific question.
>
>Have you ever used fsx (file system exerciser) to test
>Cygwin?
>
>http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=528858+0+archive/2001/freebsd-hackers/20011216.freebsd-hackers
>
>You should be able to find someone at RedHat who's
>familiar with this tool and probably has a more recent
>version. As soon as Jordan sent this out, a flood of
>patches for various platforms were sent around.
>
>I did some preliminary testing with with "-c 5 -W -R
>-L". It didn't look good, but was using an older
>Cygwin distribution.
>
>-Charles

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/