Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 09:49:57 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: It's x86
Message-ID: <20021101144957.GD3332@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20021031120202 DOT 01fec528 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <3DC255BB DOT D175D761 AT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3DC255BB.D175D761@yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 05:21:47AM -0500, CBFalconer wrote:
>Such architecture optimizations are much more likely to have been
>taken in the GUI gubris that is being used for display than in
>GCC/GDB themselves.  I think the moral is that such settings
>should be recorded in the distribution.

None of the mentioned gcc command line options were used in compiling
gdb.

This is getting tiresome.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/