Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021031100444.01fe5ba0@pop3.cris.com> X-Sender: rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:08:34 -0800 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Randall R Schulz Subject: Re: gdb hangs on a 486 In-Reply-To: <48270-2200210431175433137@M2W094.mail2web.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Larry, At 09:54 2002-10-31, you wrote: >... > > > >> Sounds like you may want to get the source, reconfigure, and build > >> your own version targeting i386 or i486. > > > >A non-trivial job, especially if the very tools are suspect. > > >A potentially non-trivial job, yes, depending on your skills and >experience building packages. I'm not sure what you're referring to >by "the very tools are suspect". These tools have been around for a >long time. They worked when these architectures were the default >configuration. It shouldn't be too hard to get them working on >those targets now. If you're referring to the fact that the tools >don't check if the run-time environment matches the configuration >environment on start-up, I think labeling the tools as "suspect" for >this oversight is a little extreme. But I may be missing your meaning. It does seem there's a bootstrapping problem. If Chuck has only a 486 machine and the only binaries he can get are compiled for post-Pentium architectures, how will he build compilers and binutils for his hardware? >Larry Randall Schulz Mountain View, CA USA -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/