Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:32:28 -0500 (EST) From: Igor Pechtchanski Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: Stan Horwitz cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Question about the ls command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Stan Horwitz wrote: > On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Cliff Hones wrote: > > > > The 'man' command is your friend. If you run "man ls" you will > > find many options for controlling the output of ls, including > > --full-time, which is probably what you need. > > Sorry, I should have stated that I checked the man page. When I do > something like "ls -ls --full-time" or "ls -ls -F --full-time" I get a > syntax error. Stan, Both commands you've quoted above work for me (Win2k). Please provide the following: 1) output of "which ls" 2) output of "ls --version" 3) output of "ls -lsF --full-time" in the directory 4) output of "ls -lsF" in the directory 5) output of "cygcheck -s -v -r" (as an attachment) Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! "Water molecules expand as they grow warmer" (C) Popular Science, Oct'02, p.51 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/