Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021030085709.0292af40@pop3.cris.com> X-Sender: rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:02:49 -0800 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Randall R Schulz Subject: Re: Question about the ls command In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed [ Move along...Move along. Nothing Cygwin-specific here. Just an RTFM. ] Stan, Use the "--full-time" option. Although the resulting format is distinct from either the "recent" or "old" date formats shown in the "-l" output format, it is uniform with no sensitivity to how far distant is the recorded file time. Randall Schulz Mountain View, CA At 08:47 2002-10-30, Stan Horwitz wrote: >Hello; > >I am new to cygwin, as I have just installed it on a Windows 2000 system, >so I hope this question is not a faq. > >With the "ls -l" command, the modification date of Windows files is >shown, however, the format of this date varies. On files from a previous >year, the year of last modificatation is included in the output, but on >files that were recently created, the year is not included. Is there a way >to get ls to display the modification date in a consistent format, >regardless of when the file was last modified? I don't really care what >the format is, as long as it is consistent so that I can write some >scripts to parse the output of ls easily. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/