Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3DB8EBC7.5050602@lapo.it> Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 08:59:19 +0200 From: Lapo Luchini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: it, en, fr, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin, emacs, mozilla References: <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20021024122730 DOT 029dac50 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <3DB85943 DOT D33D8954 AT yahoo DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > >I am amazed that, considering the warm fuzzy loving relationship >between Microsoft and Netscape/Mozilla, they continue to use VC. >I would expect them to lean over backwards to move over to gcc. > They are indeed, but converting the big build process from VC to gcc is not so easy an operation ^_^ http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134113 BTW: of course they would like some help ;-) -- Lapo 'Raist' Luchini lapo AT lapo DOT it (PGP & X.509 keys available) http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/