Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3DB85B8A.8CEA7004@yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:43:54 -0400 From: CBFalconer Reply-To: cbfalconer AT worldnet DOT att DOT net Organization: Ched Research X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Screen for cygwin References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "Harig, Mark A." wrote: > > Isn't the slow connection the most important criteria? > After all, most people who need multiple "windows" (which > screens provides) normally think of using X to get > those extra windows, but wouldn't want to use X if the > connection is slow. Why is anything needed? I find I can create multiple Cygwin screens by simply switching to the MSDOS/4DOS window, and launching another. I use a 4dos alias that executes "start c:\cygwin\cygwin.pif". The pif executes "%comspec% /c c:\cygwin\cygwin.bat". This is on W98. Same end result from clicking on things in the start menu or on the desktop. -- Chuck F (cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com) (cbfalconer AT worldnet DOT att DOT net) Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems. USE worldnet address! -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/