Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021024122730.029dac50@pop3.cris.com> X-Sender: rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 12:32:29 -0700 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Randall R Schulz Subject: Re: cygwin, emacs, mozilla In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Tomas, At 12:15 2002-10-24, Thomas L Roche wrote: >Chris Lott 10/24/2002 02:26 PM > >... > > > How well does Mozilla run on Cygwin > >That I don't know, but Moz says you can build Moz with Cygwin: see > >http://www.mozilla.org/build/win32.html Intriguing, but I don't think this produces a Cygwin binary. From the "GNU Tools for Microsoft Windows (the cygwin toolkit)" section of that page: "Cygwin is a UNIX-like environment for Windows... Mozilla uses a developer set of cygwin packages... These include gawk, make and zip utilities, and optionally cygwin perl. GCC is _not_ used and does not need to be installed." [ Emphasis and editing mine, of course. ] Note especially the last sentence. I believe this is intended for people who don't want to use the VisualC++ IDE, but I assume that since GCC is not used the VisualC++ compiler is and thus the end result is identical to that built with Visual C++. Am I misinterpreting that? Randall Schulz Mountain View, CA USA -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/