Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:26:17 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: (minor) English grammatical revisions to htdocs/cygwin-ug-net/ntsec.html Message-ID: <20021022162617.GG514@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20021022025154 DOT GA25158 AT redhat DOT com> <20021022160122 DOT 80060 DOT qmail AT web20006 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021022160122.80060.qmail@web20006.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 09:01:22AM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: >--- Christopher Faylor wrote: >> Hmm. After all of the discussion resulting from your original mention >> of documentation patches, I wouldn't have expected that you'd be >> surprised by the lack of ChangeLog or sending patches against the wrong >> source. >> >> However, thanks for the changes. Joshua, are you willing to try to >> adapt this to the documentation sources? > >Sure, looks fine. I just got back into town, so it won't be immediate. >BTW, is my recent doc/dll-info.sgml patch OK to apply? Sure. Sorry for not responding earlier. You can consider yourself as carte blanche maintainer of the docs (except for the FAQ) so you don't need approval from me. Sending any doc patches you make to cygwin-patches would still be appreciated, though, just for notification. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/