Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3DB02FD1.AF3CE58@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:59:13 -0400
From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To: cbfalconer AT worldnet DOT att DOT net
Organization: Ched Research
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Which DLL should be active?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I recently did a download and install while a cygwin bash window
was open.  I now find the following files present:

[2] c:\cygwin>dir bin\cygwin1.dll*

 Volume in drive C is WD30-PRI41     Serial number is 3CE4:239B
 Directory of  C:\cygwin\bin\cygwin1.dll*

 7-06-02   2:19         904,008  cygwin1.dll
10-13-02  23:16         926,024  cygwin1.dll.new
      1,830,032 bytes in 2 files and 0 dirs 

The question is: should the older dll be discarded and replaced
with the new? My original install was done on 2002-10-11.

-- 
Chuck F (cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com) (cbfalconer AT worldnet DOT att DOT net)
   Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
   <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>  USE worldnet address!


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/