Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021017173615.02d05530@pop3.cris.com> X-Sender: rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 17:39:36 -0700 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Randall R Schulz Subject: Re: new gdb interface In-Reply-To: <20021017160756.GB30732@redhat.com> References: <3DAE707A DOT 5438D531 AT yahoo DOT com> <200210170756 DOT g9H7umX04188 AT mailgate5 DOT cinetic DOT de> <3DAE707A DOT 5438D531 AT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed At 09:07 2002-10-17, you wrote: >On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 04:10:35AM -0400, CBFalconer wrote: > >Thomas Mellman wrote: > >> > >> Thank you, that helped. Nevertheless, let me re-iterate my plea: > >> particularly in the CYGWIN world, fancy do-dads should be optional, > >> rather than standard Unix command line behaviour (IMHO) being optional. > > > >Amen. > >Hallelujah! Praise the Lord! Nothing invented since 1980 is even remotely an improvement on what came before. "Progress" -- Bah! RRS -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/