Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 00:19:29 +0200 From: Pavel Tsekov X-X-Sender: paveltz AT MORDOR To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: File permission problems with new cygwin dll In-Reply-To: <20021017175543.GA13272@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 03:17:11PM +1300, Ross Smith wrote: > >If you take any command-line program that writes to stdout -- plain old > >"hello world" will do fine -- compile it with gcc, and run it several > >times with >> somefile, then you get a file containing several copies > >of "hello world", as you'd expect. But if you compile it with Visual > >C++ instead, then instead of appending to the file, it just overwrites > >the beginning of the file every time. > > Should be fixed in cvs. I'm generating a snapshot. > > The problem was caused by this change from Pavel Tsekov: > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-cvs/2002-q3/msg00064.html > > I had a nagging feeling that this was a problem when it was checked in. > > My fix still keeps this patch but it resets file pointers before execing > a new process. That seems to work. I should have been more careful. My mistake is that I didn't understand why the file pointer should be moved on open () back then. Removing this code fixed an "obivious" bug and seemed reasonable. Now as I looked at the code you've checked in dtable.cc, everything seems clear. Sorry :( -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/