Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021015100200.02f9c928@pop3.cris.com> X-Sender: rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 10:12:32 -0700 To: cygwin From: Randall R Schulz Subject: Improving List Archive Searching Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Hi, I would like to suggest and request that "cygcheck -s" output not be included in the body of postings to the Cygwin mailing list. Because that output includes a list of packages, DLLs and key executables, including it in the body of a message can cause many false hits when searching the list archives for message pertinent to a particular program, package or library. For this reason, I believe it's distinctly preferable to place that output in an attachment. Perhaps when cygcheck output is solicited in pursuit of a problem diagnosis the person requesting that output could include a reminder of the preference for placing that output in an attachment? I don't think this is the sort of thing to enforce the way UCE is blocked and that merely suggesting this change in practice won't eliminate it even if everyone were to agree, but if we could start to shift the general practice regarding posting of cygcheck output to one of preferring attachments, it would improve the "signal-to-noise" ratio for those putting in the effort of searching for answers already extant in the list archives before posting. Randy -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/