Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 18:31:20 +0200
From: "U-D90V2D0J\chj" <christian AT j-son DOT org>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: binutils 20021009 cvs trunk on cygwin: ld failuers
Message-ID: <20021015163120.GA3552@D90V2D0J>
References: <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20021011083907 DOT 031691d0 AT pop DOT rcn DOT com> <000401c2713a$50cb5560$0301a8c0 AT D90V2D0J> <20021011153215 DOT GA4878 AT redhat DOT com> <20021011204316 DOT GA3180 AT D90V2D0J> <20021013144927 DOT GA3840 AT D90V2D0J>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20021013144927.GA3840@D90V2D0J>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 04:49:27PM +0200, U-D90V2D0Jchj wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 10:43:16PM +0200, Christian Jönsson wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 11:32:15AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 05:24:34PM +0200, Christian J?nsson wrote:
> > > >Hmm, I don't quite follow you here.
> > > >
> > > >The PATH variable is not set by me, it's set by cygwin, right?
> > > >
> > > >The PATH contains the entry /cygdrive/c/WINDOWS/system32 but that makes
> > > >no sense if "check_case:strict" is present in the CYGWIN variable
> > > >initialising cygwin, right?
> > > 
> > > It depends on whether WINDOWS is the actual name of your directory or
> > > not.  This isn't set by Cygwin, regardless.  It's set by the system.
> > > If you are going to use strict case checking then it is up to you
> > > to make sure that all filenames are properly referenced.  As you
> > > probably noticed, there was no "Make sure all files have proper case?"
> > > option in setup.exe.  And, having the DLL actually try to figure out
> > > what case is correct would defeat the purpose of strict case checking.
> > > 
> > > I always suggest against using strict case checking.  It adds extra
> > > overhead and causes other problems since Windows assumes that it
> > > can be flexible with respect to filename cases.
> > > 
> > 
> > I can in a way understand you there, too bad it's conflicting with
> > building gcc with gcj under cygwin. see for example
> > 
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2002-09/msg00107.html
> > 
> > what do you see as the "best" way ahead?
> > 
> 
> well, I did change the PATH now so that cases match... But, still the
> same problem...
> 
> Let me ask an other question... are there any other PATHs that also might
> be affected by strict case? Such as an equivalent to LD:LIBRARY_PATH?
> 
> I believe that the wanted library is perhaps the
> /cygdrive/c/WINDOWS/SYSTEM32/user32.dll one and I'd like to test to see
> if that works then. The /cygdrive/c/WINDOWS/SYSTEM32 is inthe PATH, I can
> do a which user32.dll and it echoes that file. But how does the limker
> get to use it??
> 

I'm sorry to be bothering you here, but I have now tried without strict
case checking. I still get the same results...

/usr/local/src/gcc-binutils/trunk/objdir-binutils/ld/ld-new -m i386pe
-o tmpdir/ld-partial.o -r  ldgram.o ldlex.o lexsup.o ldlang.o mri.o ldctor.o
ldmain.o ldwrite.o ldexp.o  ldemul.o ldver.o ldmisc.o ldfile.o
ldcref.o ei386pe.o deffilep.o pe-dll.o
/usr/local/src/gcc-binutils/trunk/objdir-binutils/ld/ld-new -m i386pe 
-o tmpdir/ld1 /lib/crt0.o  tmpdir/ld-partial.o ../bfd/.libs/libbfd.a
./libiberty/libiberty.a ./../intl/libintl.a  /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.2/libgcc.a
-lc /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.2/libgcc.a -lcygwin -luser32 -lkernel32
-ladvapi32 -lshell32 /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.2/libgcc.a
/usr/local/src/gcc-binutils/trunk/objdir-binutils/ld/ld-new: cannot
find -luser32
FAIL: bootstrap

I am stuck, I don't understand what goes wrong here...


Any hints?


Cheers,

/ChJ



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/