Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: swamp-dog AT ntlworld DOT com (Guy Harrison) To: Subject: Re: Viruses being transported with cygwin messages Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 10:11:30 GMT Reply-To: Message-ID: <3db2984b.162869964@smtp.ntlworld.com> References: <006601c272eb$5750f680$855a580c AT who> <20021013191503 DOT GA976 AT redhat DOT com> <005c01c27322$0e97b1e0$9573580c AT who> In-Reply-To: <005c01c27322$0e97b1e0$9573580c@who> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g9EAEuT22576 On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 21:36:02 -0400, "Gregg C Levine" wrote: >Hello from Gregg C Levine >Okay. I'll agree with you on that notion, Christopher. No real arguement >there. Now as to about those messages? Are those actual messages? I'm >inclined to think not. Nope. Two arrived here. The original messages are in the archives... http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-08/msg00071.html http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-02/msg00636.html ...whereas the new arrivals have truncated html-ized text and what looks like Bugbear - identical 50.6k (?upx compressed?) binaries: connexionscard-pass.txt.scr james_simmons_1.jpg.scr Neither has any connection with their original poster. -- swamp-dog AT ntlworld DOT com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/