Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 19:52:24 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: "Application failed to initialize (0xc0000022)" Message-ID: <20021011235224.GC21033@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20021011180345 DOT GA1488 AT tishler DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 05:40:25PM -0400, Gerald S. Williams wrote: >Jason Tishler wrote: >> > Is it possible that this is an aspect of the dreaded "rebase" issue? >> >> I don't think so. If it was, then you would have experienced fork() >> failures with messages (not dialogs) like the following: > >That was my initial impression also. But what could >cause that error? Given its nature, I'd be really >surprised if nobody else had run into it. It's usually caused by the use of CYGWIN=ntsec and cygwin1.dll not having executable permissions, I believe. It's showed up here from time to time. So, doing something like: c:\>set CYGWIN=ntsec c:\>chmod a+rx /bin/* may help. cgf -- Please do not send me personal email with cygwin questions. Use the resources at http://cygwin.com/ . -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/