Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Gerald S. Williams" <gsw AT agere DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: "Application failed to initialize (0xc0000022)"
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 18:09:42 -0400
Message-ID: <GBEGLOMMCLDACBPKDIHFCEPKCLAA.gsw@agere.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <GBEGLOMMCLDACBPKDIHFGEPJCLAA.gsw@agere.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

Now I'm pretty convinced it's not a rebase thing but
some time of security/access issue.

I found a few references in MSDN referring to this error
message. They seem to have to do with access rights and
directories searched for a DLL (e.g., if you don't have
rights to a network drive in your path). That particular
problem isn't happening, but at least it's a lead.

Hmmm... Could the SHM extension be causing something like
a setuid()? Perhaps I have to bounce over to the XFree86
list after all...

-Jerry


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/