Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 14:10:33 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin license compliance Message-ID: <20021010181033.GA21133@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20021010135416 DOT C1876 AT westbrook DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021010135416.C1876@westbrook.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 01:54:16PM -0400, E. Westbrook wrote: >Greetings list, > >A brief question about free use of cygwin in a commercial environment. > >If I should direct this question elsewhere, I'll be grateful to learn >where. I've searched the web and the FAQs but have not found a >specific answer to this specific question. I've also telephoned the >commercial inquiry phone number listed on the Red Hat cygwin-related >website, but my calls were not returned. > >I am distributing a bash script to my cutomers and asking them to >install cygwin themselves in order to run it. I would naturally >expect that to be acceptable. However, to assist them, I am also >providing an "AutoIt" script that automates the cygwin download and >installation process for them. My interpretation is that this does >not constitute "distribution", but I'd like a more authoritative >answer. > >Your response will be gratefully received. If you are not giving anyone binaries that are compiled with cygwin then you shouldn't have to worry about licensing. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/