Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Path: not-for-mail From: Shankar Unni Subject: Re: .dll question Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 18:10:14 -0700 Lines: 15 Message-ID: <3D9B98F6.3040003@cotagesoft.com> References: <3D9B1B11 DOT 16005 DOT 3D0BDC AT localhost> <1033600781 DOT 14524 DOT 221 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-64-165-207-58.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1033607502 11011 64.165.207.58 (3 Oct 2002 01:11:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 01:11:42 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 (Compact) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en On 10/2/2002 4:19 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > No it can't. In general, C++ compilers don't interoperate. The C++-Lite > FAQ has a section on this. > From memory, the issues are: > *VMT layout > [..] And before someone jumps up and asks why this can't be reverse engineered - apart from the general difficulty of the task, there are even potential patent issues, as Microsoft claims to have patented some clever VMT layout and optimization algorithms that they use for VC++. It's unclear whether another compiler can use the same algorithm (to match VC++) without running afoul of these patents.. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/