Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id: <5.1.1.5.2.20020930172951.00a6b8a8@mail.earthlink.net>
X-Sender: jeremyhetzler AT mail DOT earthlink DOT net
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 17:44:45 -0700
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Jeremy Hetzler <jeremyhetzler AT earthlink DOT net>
Subject: Re: Moving cygwin discussions to Usenet? (e.g., alt.os.cygwin)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.49.99.0209301014230.17157-100000@goedel3.math.w
 ashington.edu>
References: <an9vjf$hhj$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org>
 <200209301154 DOT g8UBssX27530 AT mailgate5 DOT cinetic DOT de>
 <20020930131716 DOT GD23881 AT redhat DOT com>
 <an9vjf$hhj$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 10:48 AM 9/30/2002 -0700, Eduardo Chappa wrote:

>Finally, one of the advantages about a separate newsgroup is that people
>would feel more confortable asking a question. The cygwin mailing list
>tries very hard to have people not to ask questions (search the FAQs
>first, look for a better mailing list, etc). Even though I agree with this
>type of policy from an administrative point of view, I consider it to be a
>bad policy for cygwin users (the ones that run the stuff that some of you
>create), since real people are having a need for an answer and maybe
>directing a question like that towards the newsgroup would take some of
>the pressure off in sending the question to the list and getting a mean
>answer back (I got one for my first question, even though I did look at
>the archives and couldn't find anything).

A group that does all the work to answer anyone's question, no matter how 
obvious the answer or easy to find it is elsewhere, no matter that it is 
the hundredth time it has been asked that week? Yes, that sounds like a 
wonderful thing...for the people who are asking the questions. But who's 
going to do all that work? Where you are going to find these angels who 
want to spend their free time explaining "What's bash" over and over and 
over to people who are too lazy to even try Google?

On the other hand, if you are volunteering to *be* such a person, I'm sure 
nobody here would try to stop you.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/