Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Package review status From: Robert Collins To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <20020925235243.GA1261@redhat.com> References: <1032951025 DOT 8300 DOT 101 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3D919DA9 DOT 1010503 AT scytek DOT de> <1032954343 DOT 22908 DOT 5 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3D91E548 DOT 1040300 AT scytek DOT de> <1032990763 DOT 22908 DOT 46 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3D924091 DOT 5070508 AT scytek DOT de> <20020925235243 DOT GA1261 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-X6AXx+WbQm58unsUhqoK" Date: 26 Sep 2002 17:48:47 +1000 Message-Id: <1033026528.24358.121.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 --=-X6AXx+WbQm58unsUhqoK Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 09:52, Christopher Faylor wrote: > Actually, I would first suggest taking this off list. If it turns out > to be a cygwin problem then you can discuss things here. >=20 > I think that speculating about someone's personal gpg keys is remarkably > off-topic for this list otherwise. Yep, sorry. End-of-thread. Rob --=-X6AXx+WbQm58unsUhqoK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA9krvfI5+kQ8LJcoIRAj2/AJ99DPP7B1VhcolZJJ5PDJI6f02+cQCggrhY JNpqhRckiHDXFthINiDkcb0= =tWxK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-X6AXx+WbQm58unsUhqoK--