Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 19:52:43 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Package review status Message-ID: <20020925235243.GA1261@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <1032951025 DOT 8300 DOT 101 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3D919DA9 DOT 1010503 AT scytek DOT de> <1032954343 DOT 22908 DOT 5 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3D91E548 DOT 1040300 AT scytek DOT de> <1032990763 DOT 22908 DOT 46 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3D924091 DOT 5070508 AT scytek DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D924091.5070508@scytek.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 01:02:41AM +0200, Volker Quetschke wrote: >Hi! >>>So your ID from the keyservers is: FBD3EB8E, but your mail is signed from >>>KeyID C2C97282. (I don't find this ID on the keyserver) >>> >>>So, who wrote this mail for you? ;-) >>Me... >I don't doubt that, but I get: > >$ gpg --search-keys rbtcollins AT hotmail DOT com >gpg: searching for "rbtcollins AT hotmail DOT com" from HKP server >wwwkeys.de.pgp.net >Keys 1-5 of 5 for "rbtcollins AT hotmail DOT com" >(1) Robert Collins 1024 > created 2002-07-19, key FBD3EB8E >(2) Robert Collins 1024 > created 2002-07-19, key FBD3EB8E >(3) Robert Collins 1024 > created 2002-07-19, key FBD3EB8E >(4) Robert Collins 1024 > created 2002-07-19, key FBD3EB8E >(5) Robert Collins 1024 > created 2002-07-19, key FBD3EB8E >Enter number(s), N)ext, or Q)uit > 1 >gpg: requesting key FBD3EB8E from HKP keyserver wwwkeys.de.pgp.net >gpg: key FBD3EB8E: invalid subkey binding >> -----------------^^^^^^^ >gpg: key FBD3EB8E: not changed >gpg: Total number processed: 1 >gpg: unchanged: 1 > >I will double check this tomorrow on a "real" unix, maybe gpg on cygwin >has a problem. Would be good to know ;-) Actually, I would first suggest taking this off list. If it turns out to be a cygwin problem then you can discuss things here. I think that speculating about someone's personal gpg keys is remarkably off-topic for this list otherwise. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/