Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 23:35:43 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: gcc specs file format Message-ID: <20020922033543.GA21792@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 08:21:27PM -0700, Michael A Chase wrote: >On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 19:42:26 -0700 "Paul D. DeRocco" wrote: >>Sorry, but I don't see it. I grepped all the gcc.info* files (indeed, >>all the *.info* files) for "specs", and read the matches in my editor. >>I found a bunch of mentions of the specs file, but no explanation of >>it. > >>>From: Christopher Faylor >>> >>>On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 10:51:40AM -0700, Paul D. DeRocco wrote: >>>>The GNUPro Compiler Tools document mentions this file, and the gcc >>>>-dumpspecs option shows me what's in it. But where is its format >>>>documented? It's quite incomprehensible on its own. >>> >>>In the gcc info file: "info gcc" . > >I found a pretty detailed explanation inside 'info gcc' by typing 'g >Spec Files'. There's a link to it as part of the description of >-dumpspecs. I have gcc 3.2 installed, but the text looks like it's >been around since at least 2.9.5. Actually, I couldn't find this in 2.9.5, oddly enough. So, it looks like you may need to have the experimental gcc 3.2 installed if you want to read about this. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/