Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <20020920200931.30515.qmail@web21005.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 13:09:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Nicholas Wourms Subject: Re: Invisible link? To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <20020918171706.GA6789@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii --- Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 06:08:33PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: > >John Carlyle- Clarke wrote: > >> Darn -- figured it out about 10 seconds after I hit send. It > was of course a > >mount. I unmounted, created an empty /usr/lib and > >> then remounted, and now it shows in the folder listing. Sorry > about that. > > > >WARNING! This is inadvisable! Imagine... some Cygwin binary > tarballs installing > >stuff into /lib, others into /usr/lib, depending on configuration > and how the > >package works. Ditto /bin and /usr/bin. > > Actually, I don't see any harm in it at all as long as the mounts > are > set up appropriately so that c:\cygwin\lib == /usr/lib . The > existence > of a c:\cygwin\usr\lib directory should really not cause any > problems. If it helps, just think of cygwin mounts like bindmounts [mount -o bind ...] in linux. FWICT, the behavior seems to be identical [other then how you actually mount them]. Cheers, Nicholas __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/