Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 13:46:18 -0400
From: Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>
Subject: Re: rebase under ME (modphp4 broken)
In-reply-to: <20020915105250.72407.qmail@web21008.mail.yahoo.com>
To: Nicholas Wourms <nwourms AT yahoo DOT com>
Cc: Stipe Tolj <tolj AT wapme-systems DOT de>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-followup-to: Nicholas Wourms <nwourms AT yahoo DOT com>,
 Stipe Tolj <tolj AT wapme-systems DOT de>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-id: <20020916174617.GN424@tishler.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
References: <3D844ABF DOT 115A1E1C AT wapme-systems DOT de>
 <20020915105250 DOT 72407 DOT qmail AT web21008 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>

On Sun, Sep 15, 2002 at 03:52:50AM -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> --- Stipe Tolj <tolj AT wapme-systems DOT de> wrote:
> > Jason Tishler wrote:
> > > 
> > > Note that apache should *not* be distributed with any rebase since
> > > it is not an official Cygwin package.
> > 
> > yep, I know. But can you give me an other option how to rebase the
> > depending DLLs on the installted machine?!
> > 
> > I thought you guys would have packaged rebase already to the core
> > distro of Cygwin?
> 
> Actually it is taking a little more time because Ralf was able to
> come up with a rebase that was totally cygwin native and didn't use
> imagehlp.dll.

Thanks for covering for me Nicholas, but "it is taking a little more
time" because either:

    1. My current constraints do not allow me more time to work on
       integrating rebase into setup.exe.
    2. I am lame.

I will leave it as an exercise to the reader to decide. :,)

> The idea, of course, is to have an integrated rebase
> that works regardless of platform (hopefully).  Of course, I also
> imagine Robert's been as busy as you, so he really hasn't had much
> time to devote to fixing up setup to accept this backend.

See above.  Rob has only been helping me with design issues -- I am the
one "responsible" for adding rebase to setup.exe.  Of course, the
impatient (or patient) are always welcome to help.

Jason

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/