Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 10:32:24 +0200 (MEST) From: Juergen Kuersch To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: tar 1.13.19-1: option -N (--newer) extracts wrong files (incremental backup) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Authenticated-Sender: #0000382238 AT gmx DOT net X-Authenticated-IP: [193.192.230.3] Message-ID: <21605.1031905944@www41.gmx.net> X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, When a directory is archived with 'tar --newer', only files with an mtime or ctime of later than the specified date should be included in the archive, according to the tar documentation. However, the atime of a file is considered, as well, leading to addition of files to the archive which were accessed, but not modified. This results in much too big archives for incremental backups. I checked atime, ctime and mtime of the affected files with the ls --time=... command. Cygwin version is 1.3.11-3. OS version is Windows 2000 Advanced Server Ver 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3. The directory to be archived is on an SMB share on another Windows 2000 computer (same version like above). Note a similar question arose on Feb 15, 2002, by Cesar Escobar Maya, but there was no helpful answer. Can I do anything against this behaviour? GRTX, Juergen Kuersch (Mr) -- PGP public keys 0x1E6CD331 (DH/DSS) and 0x830E1B55 (RSA) available on public key servers -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/