Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <20020912110834.9914.qmail@web21001.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 04:08:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Nicholas Wourms <nwourms AT yahoo DOT com> Subject: Re: Beginnings of a patch: /etc/hosts To: Randall R Schulz <rrschulz AT cris DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020911162837.02a7c438@pop3.cris.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > As you may know, I don't subscribe to that "Use the Source, Duke" > business. > If one must understand the internal workings of a thing just to use > it, > it's not very good technology. It virtually negates the concept of > automation! Hell Yeah Randall!! I completely agree, as this "Use the Source, Duke" crap is also contrary to OOP. In OOP, as we all know, you shouldn't have to worry about how the object actually works, you should only care that it works given the proper input. In the same way, one shouldn't not be forced to learn the internals of every "tool" just to use it. As for another point, some of us aren't Star Wars fans (myself included). [I know this is off topic, but I've been rather partial to Star Trek myself...] Cheers, Nicholas __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! News - Today's headlines http://news.yahoo.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/