Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:38:38 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [Fwd: cygwin-xemacs sometimes hangs in compile with latest cygwin] Message-ID: <20020911163838.GD23481@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <000301c258ec$93a4ea60$987ba8c0 AT shalom> <3D7F079B DOT 8040609 AT Danet DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D7F079B.8040609@Danet.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 11:06:35AM +0200, Michael Lipp wrote: >Andy Piper wrote: >>It used to be the case that using pty's required you to put >> >>CYGWIN=tty >> >>in your environment. You might want to try that. Or did I suggest >>that already? Is this on Win98? > >I'm going to try this now. I rember having had this entry in my >autoexec.bat but it got lost when we upgraded to Windows 2000. I have >now put CYGWIN=tty in the system environment and, well let's see. FWIW, setting CYGWIN=tty should not be required for pty applications. It will just add more overhead for no gain. Setting CYGWIN=tty hasn't been a requirement for pty applications since, at least, 1998. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/