Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3D7DEBA8.6090901@rousselot.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 14:55:04 +0200
From: Philippe Rousselot <usergroup AT rousselot DOT org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020513 Netscape/7.0b1
X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: problem with sh script
References: <3D7DB9DF DOT 1020600 AT rousselot DOT org> <20020910144213 DOT C13307 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

thanks. the lapsus calami revealed both my mistake and my ignorance.

so, there is no sh under cygwin?


Philippe

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 11:22:39AM +0200, Philippe Rousselot wrote:
> 
>>#!/bin/sh
> 
>     ^^^^^^^
> 
>>[...]
>># this is my first bash script, don't hesitate to email me any error or 
> 
>                      ^^^^
> 
> Beep.
> 
> Corinna
> 


-- 
Philippe Rousselot.

utilisateur GNU/Linux #275608

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Any similarities to real life is completely fictitious.
Nor trees or animals were harmed in the composition of this email message.
However, a number of electrons were moderately inconvenienced.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/