Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 10:53:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Pavel Tsekov X-X-Sender: ptsekov AT moria To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: RE: Setup window size: a suggestion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > > The current size of the property sheet pages follows a recommendation from > > Microsoft on how a setup wizard should look and feel. As such it should > > look and feel good on most desktops. > > > > As far as I remember the main purpose of resizable pages is to make the > > chooser resizable. > > > > Other than that I don't see a reason to have them. > > Right. But we definitely need to do something to make the chooser page a bit > less user-hostile. My current thinking, if I can get it to work of course, is > to have that one page just be bigger, but not to have user-available resizing. Doesn't MoveWindow () help with this issue ? Do you think to make the choose bigger by default as opposed to bigger based on user choice ? Personally, I would prefer to decide by myself if I want this feature or not. Btw a single bigger page won't fit well in the picture. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/