Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 11:14:59 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: getopt/getopt_long() broken behavior
Message-ID: <20020905151459.GA16827@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <E17msMr-0000G7-00 AT smtp01 DOT mrf DOT mail DOT rcn DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E17msMr-0000G7-00@smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:52:01AM -0400, chrismorgan AT rcn DOT com wrote:
>I noticed that getopt() and getopt_long() aren't doing reordering of
>argv entries.  Searching the cygwin-developers mailing list I found
>that this is due to compiling with POSIXLY_CORRECT set.  Is there any
>plan to move back to not setting this variable?

No.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/