Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
Path: not-for-mail
From: "Hans Horn" <hannes AT 2horns DOT com>
Newsgroups: gmane.os.cygwin
Subject: Re: gcc3.2 vs gcc2.95 - devolution never stops
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:47:50 -0700
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <aklpvd$ojn$1@main.gmane.org>
References: <F187B37QfZxjAUWcsVr0000f650 AT hotmail DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p1.almaden.ibm.com
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1030646573 25207 198.4.83.52 (29 Aug 2002 18:42:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 18:42:53 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

Group,

after I was able to dig up an ostream::form() replacement I was finally able
to recompile my projects under gcc v3.2.
I'm happy with that.

What I'm not happy with at all is that the build time went up by a factor of
3, and each exe produced is between 50% and 100% bigger than the ones
produced under gcc v295!

What is going on?
Is the time and size increase due to the template orgy in the c++ libraries
I was reading about?
Does anybody know?

H.





--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/