Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3D6E3528.7080409@lapo.it>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 16:52:24 +0200
From: Lapo Luchini <lapo AT lapo DOT it>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: IPV6
References: <000d01c24f43$646d4100$46ca09c0 AT aniraj> <20020829145855 DOT Q5475 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Corinna Vinschen wrote:

>On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 03:33:58PM +0530, Niraj Agarwal wrote:
>  
>
>>Hi All,
>>Has anybody has contributed on the support of IPv6 in Cygwin?
>>    
>>
>Unfortunately not.
>  
>
...though there is some work at this address: http://win6.jp/Cygwin/
If only someone could help /Jun-ya KATO/ with his patch or just test it 
and tell him that it's stable enough to go in the trunk... 0=)

I think that only having it in setup.exe (obviously as 'test') could 
lead to a test with enough people to decide it's really good enough.

Lapo



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/