Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Boris Schaeling" <boriss AT web DOT de>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: AW: gcc3.2 vs gcc2.95 - devolution never stops
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 01:37:53 +0200
Message-ID: <LOBBKDBPKEGJJFKNFHKBEEJFHJAA.boriss@web.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <akjht4$qkj$1@main.gmane.org>



> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com]Im Auftrag
> von Hans Horn
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. August 2002 00:18
> An: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Betreff: gcc3.2 vs gcc2.95 - devolution never stops
>
>
> [...]
> none of my code compiles any more (due to missing
> ostream::form(), R.I.P.).
>
> reverting back to the "old" compiler (using gcc-2 instead of
> gcc), however,
> doesn't link because refs to ostream::endl, ostream::operator<<, and such
> are undefined.
>
> Please tell me that I am doing something terribly stupid!

ostream::form() is a non-standard method.

Boris


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/