Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <20020828122613.64729.qmail@web21010.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 05:26:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Nicholas Wourms Subject: Re: [gcc-3.2]: mbstate_t defined by gcc conflicts with cygwin header _types.h To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <20020828033814.GC25598@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii --- Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 11:15:29PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:29:06PM -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote: > >>1)Should the Cygwin header be changed? > >>2)Should the g++ header be changed? > > > >This one. It's a configury bug in libstdc++. I think I fixed it. > > Argh. To fix it correctly means making a new cygwin release. > > I love interdependencies. This isn't a critical issue, so don't sweat it. Maybe you might want to wait until a few more fixes become necessary? Also, I don't know if this is localized to x86-elf binaries or x86 in general, but there were some nasty threads on the gcc mailing list regarding 3.2 silently building bad binaries. Here are the links to the relevant threads and other info: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-08/msg01366.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-08/msg01170.html http://www.zipworld.com.au/~gschafer/lfs-tweaks.html You probably were already aware of these, but I posted just in case this might be an issue for Cygwin. Cheers, Nicholas __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/